
Posts Tagged: citrus
HLB and Florida's Citrus Future
A recent Florida TaxWatch report detailed the reasons for the decline of the Florida citrus industry. The report also described frustrations with efforts to combat citrus greening and suggested solutions for the industry's decline. Edited excerpts from that portion of the report follow:
Prominent citrus growers stated they are still optimistic about the future as many citrus entities are investing in the industry.
There have been many short-term solutions to combat citrus greening: growing trees in giant canopies to keep insects out but still allow sunlight and rain through, developing new blight-resistant citrus trees, injecting greening-resistant genes into citrus trees, and using push-pull pest management to lure pests to trap crops.
A majority of researchers believe that the only long-term solution is a new variety of citrus that is resistant to citrus greening disease. However, the use of genetic engineering in citrus production is still an ongoing debate in the citrus industry.
Most of these methods require a high investment, which many citrus growers in Florida cannot afford. The Florida citrus industry is at a critical period for survival, requiring strategic planting of citrus, scientific revitalization and increased awareness of citrus production requirements.
High investment costs present a significant hurdle for many growers. To overcome these challenges, the industry must focus on:
- Strategic replanting and infrastructure rebuilding
- Increased awareness of citrus production needs
- Continued scientific research for sustainable solutions
Preserving Florida's citrus legacy demands immediate and collaborative action to balance innovation with tradition.
Florida TaxWatch is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit taxpayer research institute and government watchdog. Its mission is to provide the taxpayers of Florida and public officials with high quality, independent research and analysis of issues related to state and local government taxation, expenditures, policies and programs.
Read the full Florida TaxWatch report, The Continuing Decline of Florida's Citrus Industry, here.
Source: Florida TaxWatch
And Which Way US Citrus
The U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Services (USDA/NASS) released a citrus forecast on Jan. 10.
FLORIDA
Florida orange and grapefruit production expectations were unchanged from the December citrus forecast. The Florida orange forecast remains at 12 million boxes and grapefruit at 1.2 million boxes.
Florida non-Valencia orange final fruit size is smaller than the average, requiring 327 pieces to fill a 90-pound box. Final droppage of non-Valencia oranges (excluding Navels) at 56% is above the maximum.
Florida Valencia orange current fruit size is average and is projected to be average at harvest. Current droppage is above the maximum and projected to be above the maximum at harvest.
Fruit size of Florida red grapefruit at harvest is projected to be above the maximum, and droppage is projected to be above the maximum. Projected fruit size of Florida white grapefruit at harvest is above average. White grapefruit droppage is projected to be above the maximum.
The Florida tangerine and mandarin forecast was cut by 14%. The forecast fell from 350,000 boxes in December to 300,000 boxes in January.
The Florida lemon forecast increased from 500,000 boxes to 600,000 boxes.
If the January forecast is realized, Florida's orange, grapefruit and tangerine/mandarin production will each be 33% less than the prior season's final production.
OTHER STATES
California's all-orange forecast was reduced from 47.7 million boxes in December to 47.4 million boxes. The California grapefruit forecast was reduced from 4.2 million boxes to 3.7 million boxes. The state's lemon and tangerine/mandarin forecast were unchanged.
Texas' all-orange forecast increased from 850,000 boxes in December to 900,000 boxes. The Texas grapefruit forecast jumped from 1.9 million boxes to 2.5 million boxes.
See the full January citrus forecast report from USDA NASS here. The next citrus forecast will be issued on Feb. 11.
Source: USDA NASS
/h6>/h6>
citrus
HLB Tolerance
By Manjul Dutt, Sheetal Ramekar and Gary England
The grapefruit was created by chance from a cross between a pummelo and a sweet orange. It was first discovered in Barbados in the 18th century.
All the commercially sold grapefruits today trace their roots back to the Duncan variety of grapefruit. Cultivars existing today were developed through natural and induced mutations as well as seedling selections. As a result, all grapefruits are very similar to one another, differing mostly in small variations in their DNA.

A recent study on a newly discovered bud sport of the Flame grapefruit, found in Bill Lennon's citrus grove in Lake County, Florida, has highlighted how natural variations can offer hope in the fight against HLB. This bud sport displayed several improved qualities. These include darker leaves, better canopy density and improved HLB tolerance compared to the Flame grapefruit from which it was derived.
Preliminary data seems to indicate that this bud sport is later maturing than regular Flame, and fruits reach maturity in early January under endemic HLB conditions (Figure 1).
Biochemical tests revealed higher chlorophyll content and lower starch accumulation, suggesting that the bud sport manages resources more efficiently under HLB stress.
Certified budwood of this new selection is freely available from the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Plant Industry's Citrus Budwood Program for nurseries and growers interested in producing it.
Manjul Dutt is an assistant professor, and Sheetal Ramekar is a postdoctoral research associate — both at the University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (UF/IFAS) Citrus Research and Education Center in Lake Alfred. Gary England is a UF/IFAS emeritus Extension agent.
HLB Deformed Citrus
hlb defprmed citrus
Wild Fire and Soil
Low-severity wildland fires and prescribed burns have long been presumed by scientists and resource managers to be harmless to soils, but this may not be the case, new research shows.
According to two new studies by a team from the University of California, Merced (UCM) and the Desert Research Institute (DRI), low-severity burns - in which fire moves quickly and soil temperature does not exceed 250oC (482oF) - cause damage to soil structure and organic matter in ways that are not immediately apparent after a fire.
"When you have a high-severity fire, you burn off the organic matter from the soil and the impact is immediate," said Teamrat Ghezzehei, Ph.D., principal investigator of the two studies and Associate Professor of Environmental Soil Physics at UCM. "In a low-severity fire, the organic matter doesn't burn off, and there is no visible destruction right away. But the burning weakens the soil structure, and unless you come back at a later time and carefully look at the soil, you wouldn't notice the damage."
DRI researcher Markus Berli, Ph.D., Associate Research Professor of Environmental Science, became interested in studying this phenomenon while visiting a burned area near Ely, Nev. in 2009, where he made the unexpected observation that a prescribed, low-severity fire had resulted in soil structure damage in the burned area. He and several colleagues from DRI conducted a follow-up study on another controlled burn in the area, and found that soil structure that appeared to be fine immediately after a fire but deteriorated over the weeks and months that followed. Berli then teamed up with Ghezzehei and a team from UCM that included graduate student Mathew Jian, and Associate Professor Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, Ph.D., to further investigate.
Soil consists of large and small mineral particles (gravel, sand, silt, and clay) which are bound together by organic matter, water and other materials to form aggregates. When soil aggregates are exposed to severe fires, the organic matter burns, altering the physical structure of the soil and increasing the risk of erosion in burned areas. In low-severity burn areas where organic matter doesn't experience significant losses, the team wondered if the soil structure was being degraded by another process, such as by the boiling of water held within soil aggregates?
In a study published in AGU Geophysical Research Letters in May 2018, the UCM-DRI team investigated this question, using soil samples from an unburned forest area in Mariposa County, Calif. and from unburned shrubland in Clark County, Nev. to analyze the impacts of low-severity fires on soil structure. They heated soil aggregates to temperatures that simulated the conditions of a low-severity fire (175oC/347oF) over a 15-minute period, then looked for changes in the soil's internal pore pressure and tensile strength (the force required to pull the aggregate apart).
During the experiment, they observed that pore pressure within the soil aggregates rose to a peak as water boiled and vaporized, then dropped as the bonds in the soil aggregates broke and vapor escaped. Tensile strength measurements showed that the wetter soil aggregates had been weakened more than drier soil samples during this process.
"Our results show that the heat produced by low-severity fires is actually enough to do damage to soil structure, and that the damage is worse if the soils are wet," Berli explained. "This is important information for resource managers because it implies that prescribed burns and other fires that occur during wetter times of year may be more harmful to soils than fires that occur during dry times."Next, the research team wondered what the impact of this structural degradation was on the organic matter that the soil structure normally protects. Soil organic matter consists primarily of microbes and decomposing plant tissue, and contributes to the overall stability and water-holding capacity of soils.
In a second study that was published in Frontiers in Environmental Science in late July, the UCM-DRI research team conducted simulated burn experiments to weaken the structure of the soil aggregates, and tested the soils for changes in quality and quantity of several types of organic matter over a 70-day period.
They found that heating of soils led to the release of organic carbon into the atmosphere as CO2 during the weeks and months after the fire, and again found that the highest levels of degradation occurred in soils that were moist. This loss of organic carbon is important for several reasons, Ghezzehei explained.
"The loss of organic matter from soil to the atmosphere directly contributes to climate change, because that carbon is released as CO2," Ghezzehei said. "Organic matter that is lost due to fires is also the most important reserve of nutrients for soil micro-organisms, and it is the glue that holds soil aggregates together. Once you lose the structure, there are a lot of other things that happen. For example, infiltration becomes slower, you get more runoff, you have erosion."
Although the research team's findings showed several detrimental effects of fire on soils, low-severity wildfires and prescribed burns are known to benefit ecosystems in other ways -- recycling nutrients back into the soil and getting rid of overgrown vegetation, for example. It is not yet clear whether the negative impacts on soil associated with these low-severity fires outweigh the positives, Berli says, but the team hopes that their research results will help to inform land managers as they manage wildfires and plan prescribed burns.
"There is very little fuel in arid and semi-arid areas, and thus fires tend to be short lived and relatively low in peak temperature," Ghezzehei said. "In contrast to the hot fires and that burn for days and weeks that we see in the news, these seem to be benign and we usually treat them as such. Our work shows that low-severity fires are not as harmless as they may appear."
The study, "Soil Structural Degradation During Low?Severity Burns," was published on May 31, 2018 in the journal AGU Geophysical Research Letters and is available here: https:/
The study, "Vulnerability of Physically Protected Soil Organic Carbon to Loss Under Low Severity Fires," was published July 19, 2018 in the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science, and is available here: https:/
IMG 2031
California Citrus
Statewide citrus bearing acreage relatively stable for past three seasons
The Pacific Regional Office of the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducts an acreage survey of California citrus growers as funding is available. The purpose of this survey is to provide bi-annual citrus acreage, which includes information on new plantings and removals. It is the continuation of a long series of industry-funded Citrus Acreage surveys.
This report consists of two parts:
- Table 1 shows estimated statewide bearing acreage for the 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23 seasons.
- Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 show detailed acreage data by type, variety, and year planted -- as voluntarily reported by citrus growers and maintained in NASS' database.
With perfect information, the estimated statewide bearing acreage and the detailed acreage data would be the same. Generally, this will not be the case for the following reasons:
- A voluntary survey of approximately 5,000 citrus growers is unlikely to ever attain 100 percent completeness.
- It is difficult for USDA/NASS to detect growers who are planting citrus for the first time.
Click here for a larger image.
Click here to read the full report.
Source: ccqc.org/wp-content
lemon tree image
ACP Training - English and Spanish
Save the Date: Training Opportunity for
Field Crews
The Citrus Pest and Disease Prevention Program is hosting free training workshops for field crew supervisors and farm labor contractors in Riverside and Ventura counties this month. The two-hour training workshops will be presented primarily in Spanish and will review best practices for field crews on how they can properly prevent the spread of Asian citrus psyllids (ACP) through hands-on training. English-language workshops can be available following each Spanish workshop; however, the English-language workshops are subject to cancellation depending on the number of sign-ups.
For more information and to RSVP, please visit our Training Workshop webpage. Please select the preferred language and meeting location for each attendee in the details below.
The Train-the-Trainer workshops will take place on the following dates:
Riverside County
Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at Citrus State Historic Park, Riverside County
- Spanish-language workshop: 9 a.m.
- English-language workshop: 11 a.m. (Subject to change)
Ventura County
Thursday, August 29, 2024 at Limoneira, Ventura County
- Spanish-language workshop: 9 a.m.
- English-language workshop: 11 a.m. (Subject to change)
The training workshops will also fulfill the requirement listed in CDFA's harvesters/farm labor contractors' compliance agreement for these industry members to stay abreast of ACP and Huanglongbing (HLB) prevention best practices.
RSVPs are strongly encouraged. Location details, workshop start times and additional information will be sent upon RSVP. Please RSVP using the following link below.
Front-line leaders in the field will learn firsthand about what they can do to reduce the risk of spreading ACP, and ultimately how to protect local groves from HLB.
During the workshop, participants will:
- Learn best practices for field crews to prevent ACP from spreading in between neighboring groves.
- Practice using effective communication techniques to help their crews and others understand these best practices and why they are important.
- Understand the threat of HLB to the livelihood of the California citrus industry.
We all must do our part if we're going to protect California citrus from this pest and disease – and field crews are the first line of defense in this effort. Packinghouses are encouraged to send their staff and crews to this valuable workshop as a way to provide an extra layer of protection in preventing the spread of ACP in their groves.
For questions, please email Makayla Thompson at mt@nstpr.com.
/aside>/h3>/h1>/h1>
ACP adult and nymph